Independent auditor’s report
To the Shareholders of BMIT Technologies p.l.c.
Report on the audit of the financial statements
Our opinion
In our opinion:
· The Group financial statements and Parent Company financial statements (the “financial statements”) give a true and fair view of the Group and the Parent Company’s financial position of BMIT Technologies p.l.c. as at 31 December 2021, and of the Group’s and the Parent Company’s financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRSs’) as adopted by the EU; and
· The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386).
BMIT Technologies p.l.c.’s financial statements comprise:
· the Consolidated and Parent Company statements of financial position as at 31 December 2021;
· the Consolidated and Parent Company statements of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
· the Consolidated and Parent Company statements of changes in equity for the year then ended;
· the Consolidated and Parent Company statements of cash flows for the year then ended; and
· the notes to the financial statements, which include significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code) together with the ethical requirements of the Accountancy Profession (Code of Ethics for Warrant Holders) Directive issued in terms of the Accountancy Profession Act (Cap. 281) that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Malta. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these Codes.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services that we have provided to the parent company and its subsidiaries are in accordance with the applicable law and regulations in Malta and that we have not provided non-audit services that are prohibited under Article 18A of the Accountancy Profession Act (Cap. 281).
The non-audit services that we have provided to the parent company and its subsidiaries, in the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021, are disclosed Note 20 to the financial statements.
Our audit approach
|
· Overall group materiality: €405,000, which represents 5% of profit before tax. |
· The Parent Company and its three subsidiaries are based in Malta, and the financial statements of these entities have been audited by our audit team. · The Group engagement team performed a full scope audit on all components.
|
|
· Assessment of carrying amount of goodwill attributable to the Group
|
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements. In particular, we considered where the directors made subjective judgements; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material if individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall group materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole as set out in the table below. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.
Overall group materiality |
€405,000 |
How we determined it |
5% of profit before tax |
Rationale for the materiality benchmark applied |
We chose profit before tax as the benchmark because, in our view, it is the benchmark against which the performance of the Group is most commonly measured by users, and is a generally accepted benchmark. We chose 5% which is within the range of thresholds that we consider acceptable. |
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above €20,000 as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matter |
How our audit addressed the Key audit matter |
Assessment of carrying amount of goodwill attributable to the Group Goodwill with a carrying amount of €3.2 million as at 31 December 2021, has arisen from a number of acquisitions effected during the preceding financial years. An assessment is required annually to establish whether goodwill that has an indefinite useful life should continue to be recognised, or if any impairment is required. The assessment was performed at the lowest level at which the Group could allocate and assess goodwill, which is referred to as a cash generating unit (CGU). Goodwill arising from acquisitions has been allocated to the Group’s Data Centre Services CGU.
The impairment assessment relied on the calculation of a value in use for the CGU. This calculation was based on estimated future cash flows for the CGU, including assumptions around revenue growth, margins and EBITDA levels, discounted at an appropriate weighted average cost of capital. The Group used its business plan as the basis for the first 5 years of cash flows and then extrapolated returns into perpetuity using a terminal growth factor.
The assumptions supporting the underlying forecast cash flows reflect significant judgements as these are affected by unexpected future market or economic conditions. The estimation of future cash flows and the level to which they are discounted is inherently uncertain and requires judgement. The extent of judgement and the size of the goodwill resulted in this matter being identified as an area of audit focus.
Relevant references in the Annual Financial Report: · Accounting policies: Note 1.6 and 1.7 · Note on intangible assets: Note 7 · Critical accounting estimates and judgements: Note 3.1
|
We evaluated the suitability and appropriateness of the impairment methodology applied and the discounted cash flow model as prepared by management.
We assessed the methodology and assumptions used by utilising our independent valuation experts. The calculations used in the model were re-performed to check accuracy and the key inputs in the model were agreed to approved sources.
Management’s cash flow forecasts used in the model were assessed by: • testing that the forecasts agreed to the most recent business plan which had been approved by the Board of Directors; • considering current year performance against plan and the reasons for any deviation also through discussion with management; and • assessing historical forecasting accuracy through back-testing by reviewing the historical achievement of the business plan given the uncertainties in forecasting, comparing the actual historical cash flow results with previous forecasts, including forecast profit margins to historical margins.
We also focused on understanding and challenging management’s future plans for the CGU and understanding the manner in which the related cash flow forecasts were drawn up. We benchmarked key assumptions in management’s forecasts in respect of revenue growth, gross margins and EBITDA margins, to the extent practicable, to relevant economic and industry indicators, where possible.
Our independent valuation experts critically assessed the discount rate and terminal growth rate used in the discounted cash flow model. The challenge of our valuation experts was focused on the methodology used to determine the discount rate utilised by reference to the overall calculated cost of capital for the Group, and on which benchmarks were the most appropriate in determining the terminal growth rate of cash flows. We independently calculated a weighted average cost of capital by making reference to market data and benchmarked the long-term growth rate to market data. We concluded that the parameters utilised by the Group were reasonable, given historic results, economic outlook, industry forecasts and other market data.
Our discussions with the Audit Committee in respect of this key audit matter focused on the key assumptions, both individually and when combined together. During these discussions, management confirmed their view that the forecast for the CGU remained appropriate and that the key assumptions were subject to oversight. We assessed the sufficiency of the sensitivity analysis performed by management. Independent sensitivity analysis was performed, making adjustments to a number of modelled assumptions simultaneously. We critically assessed whether or not a reasonably possible change to the assumptions could result in an impairment considering the sensitivity of the valuation to these assumptions. The deterioration in performance or long-term growth rate which would need to occur, or the increase in discount rate which would need to be applied to the model, that may lead to impairment in the CGU is significant in view of the comfortable level of headroom with respect to CGU carrying values. We determined that a movement in those key assumptions of this extent is unlikely. The value in use of the CGU remains in excess of the carrying amount by a comfortable headroom.
The appropriateness of disclosures made in relation to goodwill was also reviewed.
|
We have no key audit matters to report with respect to our audit of the Parent Company financial statements.
How we tailored our group audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the Group operates.
The Group’s accounting process is structured around the Group finance function at its head office. The Group audit engagement team in Malta carried out a full scope audit on all components, accounting for 100% of Group revenues and 100% of Group profit before tax.
The Group audit team performed all of this work by applying the overall Group materiality, together with additional procedures performed on the consolidation. This gave us sufficient appropriate audit evidence for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole.
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Financial Report (but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon).
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information, and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon except as explicitly stated within the Report on other legal and regulatory requirements.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The directors are responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the requirements of the Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386), and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
· Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
· Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s and the Parent Company’s internal control.
· Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
· Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s or the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group’s or the Parent company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In particular, it is difficult to evaluate all of the potential implications that COVID-19 will have on the Group’s and the Parent company’s trade, customers and suppliers, and the disruption to their business and the overall economy.
· Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
· Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
Report on compliance with the requirements of the European Single Electronic Format Regulatory Technical Standard (the “ESEF RTS”), by reference to Capital Markets Rule 5.55.6
We have undertaken a reasonable assurance engagement in accordance with the requirements of Directive 6 issued by the Accountancy Board in terms of the Accountancy Profession Act (Cap. 281) - the Accountancy Profession (European Single Electronic Format) Assurance Directive (the “ESEF Directive 6”) on the Annual Financial Report of BMIT Technologies p.l.c. for the year ended 31 December 2021, entirely prepared in a single electronic reporting format.
Responsibilities of the directors
The directors are responsible for the preparation of the Annual Financial Report, including the consolidated financial statements and the relevant mark-up requirements therein, by reference to Capital Markets Rule 5.56A, in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF RTS.
Our responsibilities
Our responsibility is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Annual Financial Report, including the consolidated financial statements and the relevant electronic tagging therein, complies in all material respects with the ESEF RTS based on the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our reasonable assurance engagement in accordance with the requirements of ESEF Directive 6.
Our procedures included:
· Obtaining an understanding of the entity's financial reporting process, including the preparation of the Annual Financial Report, in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF RTS.
· Obtaining the Annual Financial Report and performing validations to determine whether the Annual Financial Report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the technical specifications of the ESEF RTS.
· Examining the information in the Annual Financial Report to determine whether all the required taggings therein have been applied and whether, in all material respects, they are in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF RTS.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Annual Financial Report for the year ended 31 December 2021 has been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the ESEF RTS.
Other reporting requirements
The Annual Financial Report contains other areas required by legislation or regulation on which we are required to report. The Directors are responsible for these other areas.
The table below sets out these areas presented within the Annual Financial Report, our related responsibilities and reporting, in addition to our responsibilities and reporting reflected in the Other information section of our report. Except as outlined in the table, we have not provided an audit opinion or any form of assurance.
Area of the Annual Financial Report 2021 and the related Directors’ responsibilities |
Our responsibilities |
Our reporting |
Directors’ report The Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386) requires the directors to prepare a Directors’ report, which includes the contents required by Article 177 of the Act and the Sixth Schedule to the Act. |
We are required to consider whether the information given in the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.
We are also required to express an opinion as to whether the Directors’ report has been prepared in accordance with the applicable legal requirements.
In addition, we are required to state whether, in the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of our audit, we have identified any material misstatements in the Directors’ report, and if so to give an indication of the nature of any such misstatements. |
In our opinion: · the information given in the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and · the Directors’ report has been prepared in accordance with the Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386).
We have nothing to report to you in respect of the other responsibilities, as explicitly stated within the Other information section.
|
Corporate Governance - Statement of Compliance The Capital Markets Rules issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority require the directors to prepare and include in the Annual Financial Report a Statement of Compliance with the Code of Principles of Good Corporate Governance within Appendix 5.1 to Chapter 5 of the Capital Markets Rules. The Statement’s required minimum contents are determined by reference to Capital Markets Rule 5.97. The Statement provides explanations as to how the Company has complied with the provisions of the Code, presenting the extent to which the Company has adopted the Code and the effective measures that the Board has taken to ensure compliance throughout the accounting period with those Principles.
|
We are required to report on the Statement of Compliance by expressing an opinion as to whether, in light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have identified any material misstatements with respect to the information referred to in Capital Markets Rules 5.97.4 and 5.97.5, giving an indication of the nature of any such misstatements.
We are also required to assess whether the Statement of Compliance includes all the other information required to be presented as per Capital Markets Rule 5.97.
We are not required to, and we do not, consider whether the Board’s statements on internal control included in the Statement of Compliance cover all risks and controls, or form an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance procedures or its risk and control procedures. |
In our opinion, the Statement of Compliance has been properly prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Capital Markets Rules issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority.
We have nothing to report to you in respect of the other responsibilities, as explicitly stated within the Other information section. |
Remuneration report The Capital Markets Rules issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority require the directors to prepare a Remuneration report, including the contents listed in Appendix 12.1 to Chapter 12 of the Capital Markets Rules. |
We are required to consider whether the information that should be provided within the Remuneration report, as required in terms of Appendix 12.1 to Chapter 12 of the Capital Markets Rules, has been included. |
In our opinion, the Remuneration report has been properly prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Capital Markets Rules issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority. |
|
Other matters on which we are required to report by exception We also have responsibilities under the Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386) to report to you if, in our opinion: · adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us. · the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns. · we have not received all the information and explanations which, to the best of our knowledge and belief, we require for our audit.
We also have responsibilities under the Capital Markets Rules to review the statement made by the directors that the business is a going concern together with supporting assumptions or qualifications as necessary. |
We have nothing to report to you in respect of these responsibilities. |
Other matter – use of this report
Our report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Parent Company’s shareholders as a body in accordance with Article 179 of the Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386) and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior written consent.
Appointment
We were first appointed as auditors of the Company on 17 May 2010. Our appointment has been renewed annually by shareholder resolution representing a total period of uninterrupted engagement appointment of 12 years. The Company became listed on a regulated market on 15 February 2019.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
78, Mill Street
Zone 5, Central Business District
Qormi
Malta
Fabio Axisa
Partner
29 March 2022